Follow by Email

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Let's not say 'Let them all kill each other'

"There are credible reports that the death toll now often exceeds 100 civilians a day, including many women and children," U.N. Under-Secretary-General for political affairs Lynn Pascoe told the U.N. Security Council. "The total killed so far is certainly well over 7,500 people." - Reuters report, 28 February, 2012, on the assault of Bashar al-Assad's forces on the civilian population of Syria
There is a saying among people for whom the disintegration of an enemy's infrastructure of steel and flesh, through mayhem, madness and war, is greeted with darkly cynical glee. "Let them all kill each other," they declare, feeling that they are blessed to be witnessing some kind of karmic cycle, in which the wicked devour each other into nonexistence. In mythological terms, it's like watching Titan Cronus (or Saturn) eat his children out of fear they would overthrow him, and cheering at every flesh-tearing bite like a bloodthirsty crowd at a 2012 Republican debate.
In the Cronus story, Zeus, the secretly exiled son, returns to free his siblings, who are still around, twisting in the old titan's gut. He forces his dad to regurgitate a family reunion, and the rest is myth-tory. But in the twenty-first century version, the onlookers are hoping that Assad will gorge himself until he consumes even his friends in Iran, at which point he will agree to eat a wafer thin mint, then explode. Check please.
There is a problem in the logic that says it is good fortune to get to observe Syria's carnage with your hands clasped behind your butt, like a dispassionate scientist watching a lion take down a zebra on the Discovery Channel. Of course it comes off as a cold and dispassionate exercise, but it also is shortsighted.
As an example of the perils of this schadenfreude, one does not have to look much farther than the United States' 2012 presidential race. Look how gleeful Democrat pundits and politicians are, at the way the GOP seems to be imploding, devouring each other, charring the Republican brand to hard, black toast. Actually, their self immolation is real, but it has an expiration date, and it's not when there's no one left standing. There will be a phoenix for them, rising from this "fucking mess," as GOP strategist Ed Rollins said, in describing Republican reaction to the party's primary insanity, to writer John Heilemann for a recent (and awesome) New York Magazine article.
When they are done going at each other, they will reach consensus and turn their fangs on us, and all the happiness we may now have watching the GOP going so far off the reservation - hell, to the moon and beyond - is going to have to transform to resolve. Otherwise, we'll still be standing there, grinning like idiots at the last slapstick frame of the primaries, while the Republican nominee and his super PAC mount an effective, money filled campaign against President Obama.
So it is with what is going on in Syria and Yemen and Egypt. To be sure, from a humanitarian standpoint, the stakes in the events in the Middle East and Southwest Asia are much, much higher, as the people there are enduring profound pain and sorrow to which the petty words of American electoral rhetoric are incomparable. They are killing each other, but the lesson is the same. Eventually, they too will reach an accord, and they will turn, or return, to their age old political and cultural enemies, and that is us.
So temper your humanness with your humanity. Have a heart for the suffering of others, when that's all that you can give. Raise your voice, so they cannot help but listen. Finally, it is better to engage your enemies; don't engorge yourself with fear and animosity. You'll never, ever, be able to keep all that hostility down. It will come back on you like a garlicky pizza, or a rebellious child. -PBG

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Culture - a cause for war, a means for consensus

"In great contests each party claims to act in accordance with the will of God. Both may be, and one must be, wrong."
- President Abraham Lincoln, from Meditation on the Divine Will, 1862

Happy birthday, to America's strongest cultural warrior

The fight against slavery was a culture war. So were the battles to control European immigration, the fight for women's suffrage and the marches against Jim Crow laws. They were all assaults on a status quo that refused to acknowledge the promise of a country established on justice, fairness, and possibility.

Those who grip to their ethnic past as an identity - whether racist, righteous, or radical - deny the dynamism of collective will. They push back against the sunshine of a more tolerant society by hiding the disdain on their faces below hoods and hat brims, by huddling their children into the dark caves of home schooling, and by gathering with their communities under the shade of ever expanding tents of religious dogma. To them, Washington, DC is Rome, and they are Judean zealots, hiding in the hills, waiting for the Lord - the mighty hand of God - to help them with their rebellion.

So hoist your banners high, and ready your flanks, for there is an active theater in the culture wars. Lest you doubt the current contraception debate is a call to muster, remember that the Republicans like to call it a "War on Religion," and for women's health advocates, the conservatives are waging another battle in the "assault on women's rights."

Of at least three major stories that have pushed cultural touchstones to the fore in the last week, the most press was from the contraception "misstep" of the Obama administration. The Department of Health and Human Services dealt with it by coming up with a compromise that satisfied most, but not all, religious institutions, to whom the rule enabling free contraceptives to people of all faiths, despite the religious ethics of the institutions at which they work, would apply.

Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said the White House ruling "will not stand." Republican hatchet man, and chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), titled a Thursday hearing on the issue, with the unfactual, hyperbolic and rhetorical, "Lines crossed: Separation of church and state. Has the Obama administration trampled on freedom of religion and freedom of conscience?"

This, of course, follows the feud between Susan G. Komen for the Cure, and Planned Parenthood, which had the right and left taking sides, and in which, eventually, women were the ultimate victors, at least for now.

But the assault continues, with what one Virginia State House delegate called "an attack on women's health." Charnielle Herring was referring to the draconian, invasive Virginia anti-abortion bill that requires women who choose to abort their pregnancies to be vaginally penetrated for "fetal ultrasound imaging and auscultation of fetal heart tone services.... for the purpose of determining gestational age.  When only the gestational sac is visible during ultrasound imaging, gestational age may be based upon measurement of the gestational sac." Rarely is the assault so literal as it is in this law requiring medical professionals to stick something into a woman against her will.

Yet more battles are brewing. Washington recently became the seventh state to make gay marriage a legal institution, and it has just passed in New Jersey, although Gov. Chris Christie promises a veto. Maryland is on the verge of passing a gay marriage law, and similar legislation, introduced in Illinois, has won the support of Chicago mayor, and former Obama Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel.

The victory of the cultural warrior is neither Pyrrhic nor shallow. We fight as much for who we are now as for who we want to become, for whether this is a nation only of the exclusionary principle "In God We Trust," or the all embracing unifier, "E Pluribis Unum -Out of many, one." Even an arch-Conservative like Barry Goldwater called for a "reconciliation of diversity with unity" (even though he was talking about unifying the crazy and the practical members of the GOP).

Recent news reports about incidents of interracial marriages in this country seem to bear out Goldwater's advice, quite literally. According to data from the Pew Research Center, released Thursday, marriages that cross racial or ethnic boundaries were at an all time high of 15% in 2010. Add to that, the research shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans "'would be fine' ... if a member of their own family were to marry someone outside their own racial or ethnic group," and it seems that at least one small cultural battle in this country is finally getting put to bed.

Victory on the field of cultural battle may be seen as the last gasp of free thought and reason, left black and ashen, in the smoldering ruins of a civilization of promise. Victory may also be seen as the legacy of unaccepting intolerance finally falling into legend, and becoming a cautionary tale about how we were almost diverted from the city on the hill we built from our commitment to unity. The willingness to hold the flagpole, though, when the fighting is over, has to include looking at the other hands raising the flag with you, like soldiers on Iwo Jima, and feeling pride that whether we agree or disagree, despite our uncommon pasts, we hold a common future.
"We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."
- President Abraham Lincoln, at his first inaugural, March 4, 1861